Justice Action

time for Justice Action

 

Campaign Documents


The closed and secretive system of the NSW Health Department’s forensic hospitals is getting exposure through the case of Saeed Dezfouli. It shows systemic abuse of dependent people cloaked as care.

THE RIGHT TO A NAME

Saeed has had to fight for the right to include his own name in his campaign against mistreatment and for freedom. Now before the Supreme Court, this case boils down to a battle over Saeed's right to an identity. In enacting section 162 of the Mental Health Act 2007, the Health Department argues that these measures are protecting Saeed, not the Department from accusations of mistreatment.

It went before the Tribunal on 30/09/10.

Media release Health submission Saeed's submission.

The fight for Saeed's right to use his name continues before the Supreme Court on 04/08/11.

Affidavit of B. Collins 11/03/11


The Supreme Court case is a result of Saeed's appeal against his treatment, but both Justice Health and the Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) have fouht to prevent his exposure.

Media release

The Tribunal hearing transcript and reasons are here.

Affidavit Annex

Appeal media release

Poster download

Now they refuse him visitors who aren't "friends" defined by the Health Department as having physically touched him. The community access report further explains the denial of the right to visit mental health patients.

On Thursday, 11/2/10, the Mental Health Review Tribunal (MHRT) had its compulsory six monthly review of Saeed at which a number of documents were tabled on his behalf. Downloadable here Saeed profile Right to Education Right to refuse medication Now this will be exposed in a Supreme Court challenge.


Saeed is in a unique position. He has watched the system from inside for eight years, and points out its hypocrisy, whilst Justice Health tries to crush him into submission with the rest. He is a gentle person never wanting to hurt anyone they agree he is non-violent, but every two weeks eight staff hold him down and inject him with a powerful sedative. And then he is held in the highest security area the Forensic Hospital. We became his Primary Carer when there was no-one else.

Saeed whistleblew
on the Long Bay Hospital’s new 18 hour lockdown policy in 2008, mobilised patients to protest, got support from the whole mental health industry and forced the transfer of the patients from prisons to the Health Department. Long Bay Lockdown He spoke on ABCTV Stateline YouTube link


Saeed is suffering because he won't shut up
. Justice Health has absolute power. Patients have no finite sentence and are totally dependent on the treating psychiatrist. The principles of s.68 of the Act don't apply in practice. Mental Health Act The authority of the MHRT Forensic Provisions Act isn't applied. No one cares in this care system, charging the taxpayer $200,000 a year for Saeed, and $130m for the new privately financed Bay hospitals.

Complaints for Saeed:

* He is no threat to anyone and just needs support in the community after eight years isolated in a cell.

* They won't change his psychiatrist despite no communication - the chair of the MHRT laughed at this request.

* Forcibly injecting him.

* No access to education.

* No choice of association.

* No exercise.

* Tobacco removed.

* Justice Health refused two support people access to the MHRT hearing although it is a public hearing http://tinyurl.com/yaj47vh and previously a MP’s policy adviser and support person were present.

* A promised comprehensive review was abandoned after the Health Minister was approached by Sylvia Hale MLC.

Consumer representation
for those under the Health Department should be easy - a basic win-win opportunity paid by the taxpayer. In reality the weakness of the consumers and funding dependency of organisations means that no-one confronts government policy. On the Long Bay lockdown, on smoking and now patients' rights generally, no-one stands beside them.


The OUR PICK Report

Saeed's treatment at the hands of Justice Health shows corruption, waste and power totally out of control. It shows hypocrisy and deceit so endemic to the system that it isn't questioned. It shows those entrusted with supervision and service provision in the mental health area, not interested beyond their own status and pay. The OUR PICK Report highlights the problem and proposes a solution.

Media release.

Poster consumer consultation.



Get Involve
Donate
Give us work

Justice Action Team login