Justice Action

time for Justice Action

 
2006 Prison Stats PDF E-mail
PRISONER SNAPSHOT
Prisoner numbers have increased by 42% in last 10 years.
At 30 June 2006 there were 25,790 prisoners (sentenced and unsentenced) in Australian prisons, an increase of 2% (437 prisoners) from 30 June 2005. This represented an imprisonment rate of 163 prisoners per 100,000 adult population.

Unsentenced prisoners comprised 22% (5,581) of the total prisoner population, an increase of 9% (448 prisoners) since 30 June 2005. Most (57% or 14,676) prisoners had served a sentence in an adult prison prior to the current episode. The offence/charge of acts intended to cause injury accounted for the highest proportion (18% or 4,630) of all prisoners. Of the total prisoner population, 7% (1,827) were female and 24% (6,091) were Indigenous. The median age of all prisoners was 33 years. Three quarters of the total prisoner population was located in New South Wales (38% or 9,822), Queensland (22% or 5,562) and Victoria (15% or 3,905).

The median age of all prisoners in Australian prisons at 30 June 2006 was 33 years. Most prisoners (70%) were aged between 20 and 39. Prisoners aged less than 20 comprised 3% of the total prisoner population. Adult prisoner numbers have increased by (42%) over the last decade, according to figures released today by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS).

There were 25,800 people in Australian adult prisons at June 2006 - an increase of 2% over the previous year. This represented an imprisonment rate of 163 prisoners per 100,000 adult population.

Most Prevalent Offences
The most prevalent offences for sentenced prisoners were: 'acts intended to cause injury, including assault' (15%); 'sexual assault and unlawful entry with intent' (both 12%); 'homicide'; 'robbery and extortion'; and 'illicit drug offences' (all 10%).

The proportion of sentenced prisoners with a most serious offence of 'robbery and extortion' decreased from 14% in 2001 to 10% in 2006. 'Acts intended to cause injury' increased over this same period (from 12% in 2001 to 15% in 2006).

Half (10,200) of the sentenced prisoner population were sentenced in the 12 months preceding 30 June 2006. Sentenced prisoners had an average sentence length of 4.9 years, while the average expected time to serve was 3.5 years.

Other facts as of 30 June 2006 were:
  1. - There were 13 times more men in prison than women (24,000 men and 1,800 women)
  2. - Indigenous prisoners comprised 24% (6,100) of the total prisoner population
  3. - The number of male prisoners increased by 1% (or 350 prisoners) from 30 June 2005 while the number of female prisoners increased by 5% (90)
  4. - The median age of all prisoners was 33 years
  5. - The majority (70%) of prisoners were aged between 20 and 39 years
  6. - There were 5,600 unsentenced prisoners, an increase of 9% from 30 June 2005
  7. - Unsentenced prisoners in custody were on remand for an average of 4.9 months.


Changes in the Prisoner Population
The total prisoner population increased by 2% from 25,353 on 30 June 2005 to 25,790 on 30 June 2006. Over the ten year period, from 1996, the prisoner population increased by 42%.

Change in Prisoner Numbers Between 30 June 2005 and 30 June 2006
Between 2005 and 2006, the prisoner population increased in all states and territories except for the Australian Capital Territory, Tasmania and the Northern Territory. The decrease in the Australian Capital Territory is due to a change in the way the Australian Capital Territory counts periodic detainees (see Explanatory Notes, paragraph 77). Tasmania decreased by 7% and the Northern Territory by 3%. The highest proportional increases were for South Australia and Victoria (both 6%) followed by Queensland (4%).


Indigenous Prisoners
Indigenous prisoners represented 24% of the total prisoner population at 30 June 2006, the highest proportion at 30 June since 1996.

The proportion of prisoners that were Indigenous was variable across states and territories. In the Northern Territory 82% of the prisoner population was Indigenous while Victoria had the lowest proportion (6%).

When comparing rates of imprisonment for Indigenous and non-Indigenous prisoners, it is recommended that age standardised rates be used. (For further explanation refer to Explanatory Notes, paragraphs 24-29.) The age standardised rate of Indigenous imprisonment was 1,668 per 100,000 adult Indigenous population, 13 times more than the non-Indigenous rate at 30 June 2006.

Indigenous persons were 18 times more likely to be in prison than non-Indigenous persons in Western Australia. In Tasmania, Indigenous persons were 3 times more likely to be in prison, recording the lowest age standardised ratio of Indigenous to non-Indigenous rates of imprisonment.

Age and Sex

Males dominated the prisoner population comprising 93% (23,963) of the total, whilst females comprised 7% (1,827). The number of female prisoners increased by 5% (93) from 30 June 2005, whilst the number of male prisoners increased by 1% (344) for this same period. Over the last 10 years the number of female prisoners has increased by 90% from 964 at 30 June 1996 to 1,827 at 30 June 2006. The number of male prisoners has increased by 39% from 17,229 to 23,963 for the same period.

Indigenous Prisoners

The age profile of Indigenous prisoners differed to non-Indigenous prisoners. The median age of Indigenous prisoners was 31 while non-Indigenous prisoners was 34. There were proportionally more Indigenous prisoners (83%) aged under 40, than non-Indigenous prisoners (70%).

Sentenced Prisoners
There were 20,209 sentenced prisoners in Australian prisons at 30 June 2006, a decrease of less than 1% since 30 June 2005 (20,220).

Most Serious Offence

Six offences accounted for 70% of sentenced prisoners: acts intended to cause injury (15%); sexual assault and unlawful entry with intent (both 12%); homicide, illicit drug offences, and robbery and extortion (all 10%).
Over the past 5 years, the proportion of sentenced prisoners with an offence of acts intended to cause injury increased from 12% in 2001 to 15% in 2006. The proportion of prisoners with an offence of robbery and extortion decreased over the same period from 14% in 2001 to 10% in 2006.

Most Serious Offence - Indigenous Prisoners

Over 40% of all Indigenous prisoners were sentenced for acts intended to cause injury (28%) and unlawful entry with intent (14%). In comparison, these offences accounted for just over 20% of all non-Indigenous sentenced prisoners, with acts intended to cause injury and unlawful entry with intent both at 11%. Indigenous sentenced prisoners with an offence of illicit drugs comprised 2% of the total number of sentenced Indigenous prisoners compared to 13% of non-Indigenous sentenced prisoners.

Prisoners Sentenced in the Last 12 Months
Half (or 10,154) of all sentenced prisoners were sentenced in the 12 months preceding 30 June 2006. Of those prisoners sentenced in the last 12 months, 61% had served a sentence in an adult prison prior to the current episode being served.

Sentence Lengths - Aggregate Sentence Length
Of all sentenced prisoners, 5% were serving life or another indeterminate sentence, while a further 4% were serving a sentence of periodic detention (available in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory only). Of the remaining sentenced prisoners, the majority (63%) had an aggregate sentence length of less than 5 years. Those with an aggregate sentence length of less than 2 years comprised 35% of all sentenced prisoners.
Excluding prisoners with indeterminate, life and periodic detention sentences, the median aggregate sentence length for sentenced prisoners was 3 years (36 months). (See paragraphs 56-58 of the Explanatory Notes for information about interpreting mean and median sentence lengths based on a census 'snapshot'). The longest median aggregate sentence lengths were for homicide (15 years or 180.1 months), sexual assault (7 years or 84 months) and robbery and extortion (6 years or 72 months). The median aggregate sentence lengths for all three of these offences have remained unchanged since 30 June 2005.

Most Serious Charge
Of the unsentenced prisoners, 29% had a most serious charge of acts intended to cause injury, followed by unlawful entry with intent (12%).
Caution should be exercised when comparing most serious charge between 2006 and previous years, as movements have been impacted by a change to the classification used to determine most serious charge for some states and territories (see Explanatory Notes paragraph 63).
Time on Remand
Time on remand is influenced by a number of factors, including the time it takes for a case to come before a court, and eligibility for and availability of bail. The median number of months spent on remand by unsentenced prisoners in custody at 30 June 2006 was 2.6 months. (See paragraphs 56-58 of the Explanatory Notes for information about interpreting median time on remand based on a census 'snapshot'). The longest amount of time spent on remand was by prisoners charged with homicide (median of 8.8 months), followed by sexual assault (median of 4.5 months).

Indigenous Unsentenced Prisoners

Indigenous unsentenced prisoners were more likely to be on remand for acts intended to cause injury (45%) than non-Indigenous unsentenced prisoners (24%). Indigenous unsentenced prisoners were less likely to be on remand for charges of homicide and related offences (7% of Indigenous remandees, 10% of non-Indigenous remandees) and illicit drug offences (1% of Indigenous remandees, 10% non-Indigenous remandees).

The median time spent on remand by Indigenous prisoners at 30 June 2006 was 2.1 months, less than that spent on remand by non-Indigenous prisoners (2.9 months). The median time on remand by Indigenous prisoners was less than non-Indigenous prisoners for almost all charge types except sexual assault (5.6 months for Indigenous prisoners compared to 4.4 months for non-Indigenous prisoners), unlawful entry with intent (2.2 months compared to 2.0 months respectively) and public order offences (1.9 months compared to 1.7 months respectively).
Periodic Detainees

The sentencing option of periodic detention, where detainees are in custody for two consecutive days in a week and remain at liberty the rest of the week, is available only in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. There were 777 periodic detainees at 30 June 2006. The number of periodic detainees decreased since 2005 both in New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory, however the decrease in the Australian Capital Territory is due to a change in the way the Australian Territory counts periodic detainees (see Explanatory Notes, paragraph 77). In New South Wales the number of periodic detainees decreased by 15% (from 855 in 2005 to 724 in 2006).


Sources:
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig096.gif
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig097.gif" http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig097.gif
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig097.gif" http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig097.gif
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig096.gif" http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig096.gif
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig064.gif" http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/facts/2005/fig064.gif
LINK: http://www.aic.gov.au/publications/cfi/cfi093.gif





 
Prison Statistics PDF E-mail
At 30 June 2005 there were 25,353 prisoners (sentenced and unsentenced) in Australian prisons, an increase of 5% (1,182 prisoners) since 30 June 2004.

This represented an imprisonment rate of 163 prisoners per 100,000 of the adult population. Unsentenced prisoners comprised 20% (5,133) of the total prisoner population. Most (60% or 15,308) prisoners had served a sentence in an adult prison prior to the current episode. Of the total prisoner population, 7% (1,734) were female and 22% (5,656) were Indigenous. The median age of all prisoners was 32 years.

New South Wales held the largest number of prisoners (39% or 9,819), followed by Queensland (21% or 5,354), Victoria (15% or 3,692) and Western Australia (14% or 3,482).

Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics

Read more...
 
Nowra’s burden PDF E-mail


The local community was promised jobs and economic stimulation to the tune of $10 million a year in return for bearing the stigma of being a prison town. However with as few 200 permanent jobs being offered at the prison and MP Matt Brown’s recent acknowledgement that as many as 40% of these jobs may not go to local people this level of stimulus seems unlikely. So although Nowra can expect all the stigma and consequences that come with playing host to the states newest correctional mistake it is unlikely to see the $10 million flow on stimulus the local community was promised when accepting the proposal.

Nowra is already a community that needs help. With high unemployment rate, less then 30% High School completion and little in the way of public transport Nowra is in need of many things, a prison however is not one of them. A TAFE college or community education could help people in the community prepare for employment and actually cut crime rates, improved public transport could allow these people to search for jobs in a wider area.

Rather then helping this disadvantaged community get back on its feet the addition of a prison in the local area promises to add to this burden. There will be large numbers of family and friends visiting prisoners, many of these people will be disadvantaged and some will need support when they are visiting. Some will move temporarily to be near their family member and will need social support and services.

There is likely to be the need for supported accommodation and transitional/emergency housing, which brings with it the need for increased services such as Centrelink and medical care both for prisoners, visitors and releasees. The Nowra and larger Shoalhaven community is already stretched to its limits for health care and social services but will undoubtedly be forced to absorb the extra pressure.

With evidence suggesting that prisons are more likely to breed crime than to cut offending rates it is not just Nowra that will feel the negative effects of this prison.

Limits of Incarceration

While the link between crime and incarceration seems logical, many studies have revealed that incarceration has a negative impact on crime rates. Research indicates that increasing the imprisonment rates may result in more crime, particularly amongst certain types of offenders.

The social and personal damage which is involved with incarceration serves to explain this finding. The imprisonment of offenders effectively amounts to society relinquishing its responsibility to deal with the problems at hand. By excluding the problems in this way, society is limiting its ability to understand the origins of crime and thus perpetuating its continuation.

In addition to this, it has been found that prisons often serve as colleges of crime for offenders, rather than rehabilitation centres. In this way, society's incarceration of offenders serves to fuel the very problem, which they sought to solve. The effect of this has inevitably been seen through the recidivism rate, which in NSW currently sits 3% above the national average at 42%.

The negative effect of incarceration on offenders is evident through the personal damage that the process fosters. United States research has proven that the growth of incarceration has had profoundly disruptive effects that radiate into other spheres of society. The persistent removal of persons from the community to prison and their eventual return has a destabilising effect that has been demonstrated to fray family and community bonds, and contribute to an increase in recidivism and future criminality . Moreover, Russell Hogg at the University of New England recognises that "incarceration destroys or disrupts the links individuals have with conventional domains of life, like family, employment, secure housing and so on, links whose fragility or fracture is usually a factor leading to the involvement in crime and whose rehabilitation is crucial to the resumption of a law- abiding existence. "

In this sense the necessity and desirability of developing an additional prison is questionable. The most recent figures from the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research show that crime rates for all 17 major crime categories were falling or stable over the 24 months to September 2010 both in NSW overall and in the Illawarra region, where the prison has been built.  

Despite this reduction in crime rates however, the imprisonment rates have been on the incline. Professor Paul Wilson, Chair of Criminology at Bond University puts this trend down to one thing: "The more prisons you build the more you are forced to fill them". As has been demonstrated historically the building of a new prison is more likely than anything else to increase the prisoner population.

The inclusion and use of solitary confinement cells in the prison could further traumatise prisoners and lead to mental health issues in the prison community. It is widely known that solitary confinement alone, even in the absence of other harsh treatment can cause significant mental health issues including hallucinations, delusions, depersonalisation and declines mental functioning. Solitary confinement is banned under Common Article Three of the Geneva Conventions as it amounts to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

With the harsh effects of solitary confinement it is especially alarming that the cells were built to minimum standards despite the $155 million price tag and the excess space around the cells that could have been used to create more humane accommodation. There is no doubt that the harsh mental effects of this type of imprisonment are an impediment to the rehabilitation of prisoners and this surely has an impact on their ability to become responsible members of society upon their release.

Alternatives to Incarceration

The NSW government has claimed that the need to develop a correctional facility in the Illawarra region stems from the previous lack thereof and the benefit of providing a rehabilitation facility close to offenders' families. However, this rationale ignores any possible alternatives to incarceration and the benefits of such alternatives.

Restorative Justice is a pragmatic response to the shortcomings of the law and order system. It recognises that prisons often actually work as colleges of crime that increase recidivism, that tougher punishment does not deter crime and that the cost of the prison system is a massive social burden, which is highly ineffective. The Restorative Justice approach, promotes the repair, reconciliation and rebuilding of relationships in the community as a result of crime, focusing on transforming the offender. The NSW has recognised he importance of such programs but seems hesitant to to act on them in any substantial manner.

The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 states that in NSW imprisonment is a penalty of last resort (s5). Therefore, the following community- based sanctions and programmes can be used as an alternative to incarceration :
-    Magistrate's early referral into treatment program
-    Drug court
-    Circle Sentencing
-    Intensive court supervision programme
-    Good behaviour bonds
-    Community service orders
-    Periodic detention
-    Home detention

The availability of some of these programs in rural areas is however more limited than in urban areas. In this way, the funding which has been dedicated to the development of the prison would have been more beneficial to the community if used to develop and maintain the facilities for these programmes.

Conclusion

The prison at Nowra is clearly inappropriate for not only the local community but also society in general. The harsh conditions that prisoners are exposed to only serve to complicate the rehabilitation process and prey on already vulnerable people. There is no reason to keep building such institutions when there are alternative sustainable programs that are yet to be given the time and resources they need to be successful.

For Nowra the prison will come to be a burden that it is not equipped to carry. The extra strain on resources and stigma involved is likely to exacerbate the problems they are already struggling to deal with. It is an unfortunate reality that many of the young people of Nowra could be the ones to fill the cells built in their own town.

It is time that society and the State Government realised that prisons are not the answer. Let Nowra be the last community to suffer this particular fate.

 
Get Involve
Donate
Give us work
What a great team of committed people. http://t.co/6Q9x6TOU
Is that time machine still traveling around. http://t.co/fLsmkanf
FORCED MEDICATION Mental health patients possess the same human rights as very other individual in the world.... http://t.co/zQ0L2LgJ
Loughner's forced medication approved by appeals court In a 2-1 ruling, federal judges say the Tucson shooting... http://t.co/umnBKh3j
Being forced to take a treatment you think may harm you is extremely traumatizing. If we want to reduce... http://t.co/88KO1y7f

Justice Action Team login